A blog about religion, politics, business, and economics.

Category: Politics (Page 2 of 2)

What Happened to Us?

Terror on the Right: What happens when the pursuit of power trumps patriotism.

May 19, 2017

I guess you could say I was a child of the sixties, a decade marked by turmoil. It started with the Civil Rights Movement, led by Martin Luther King, Jr., which ultimately led to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended the infamous Jim Crow laws in the American South, our version of Apartheid. The Civil Rights Act, while a huge step forward, didn’t create equality, justice, and peace overnight, as the decade’s numerous race riots and the assassination of Dr. King vividly show.

The other great movement of the sixties was the anti-war movement, opposed to American involvement the Vietnam War. Because of the draft, thousands of conscripts were pulled from American cities and towns into the military and sent to fight in the jungles of southeast Asia. As casualties mounted, so did opposition to the war. The anti-war movement gained strength and spawned other leftist movements, which opposed just about everything in America. I spent my teenage years in Ann Arbor, Michigan, a hotbed of left-wing radicalism and anti-war activism. I remember a march where someone waved the Viet Cong flag. The Students for a Democratic Society – founded in Ann Abor – called for revolution to overthrow “capitalism”.

Most Americans back then, including many who opposed the Vietnam War, were appalled by the excesses of the far left. We could disagree on politics, but for most of us, our allegiance to the country was never in question. And once the war was over, many of the long-haired hippie types cut their hair, put on suits, and joined the “establishment”. Many of them became Republicans.

So, let’s fast-forward half a century. In 2014, rancher Cliven Bundy and his armed supporters, self-proclaimed “militiamen”, threatened to do battle with law enforcement officers attempting to enforce a court order to impound his cattle to pay grazing fees owed to the federal government. Amazingly, the insurrectionists were supported by a number of Republican politicians. As the 2016 election approached, some right-wing “militias” were training for civil war in case Hillary Clinton got elected. But Trump’s election hasn’t brought peace. With opposition to Donald Trump growing throughout the country, some of his supporters are still talking of civil war against “left-wing terrorists”. And at the end of April, a self-described conservative walked into a campus coffee shop in Lexington, KY, and asked customers what their political affiliation was. If they answered Republican, he left them alone. If they said Democrat, he attacked them with a machete.

Mainstream sixties conservatives would have been appalled by this. William F. Buckley Jr., for example, steadfastly opposed the John Birch Society for its conspiracy-mongering and extremism. If he were alive today, he’d certainly have harsh words for the Tea Party, militiamen, and Trump supporters. But today’s Republicans can’t find it in themselves to condemn advocates of sedition and extremism, as long as they vote Republican.    

We now have a “conservative” Republican president whose ties to a hostile Russian government are suspect and about whose incompetence there is no doubt. The Justice Department has appointed a special counsel to investigate the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia. How have Republican leaders reacted? With a few honorable exceptions (such as Senators Lindsey Graham and John McCain), the silence has been deafening.

In the “good old days”, Republicans and Democrats could work together. Both parties supported the space program. Both parties voted for the Civil Rights Act. On foreign policy, the norm for both parties was, “politics stops at the water’s edge”. Shutting down the federal government was unthinkable, as was refusing to raise the debt ceiling. Back in the sixties, America worked, even during the depths of the Vietnam War.

What’s happened to us? The same thing that happened to the Roman Empire after Marcus Aurelius died. Power, not patriotism, reigned supreme, and the Empire descended into a period of civil strife. But today, everything happens much faster, thanks to modern media. The media could be a force for educating the public, but many Americans have no use for education. Rather, they tune in to TV and talk radio commentators who confirm what they already believe. Roger Ailes, who died on May 18, built Fox News into a “conservative” kingmaker. He combined right wing ideology with flashy entertainment, which hooked much of the white middle class. Rush Limbaugh and others were even wilder, hatching conspiracy theories and blaming all the country’s problems on “progressives”. Amazingly, new media outlets, like Breitbart, opened to the right of Fox News, as if there were much space there!  

Republican politicians soon learned that compromising and negotiating with Democrats would get them a primary challenger for the next election. The key to a long career as a Republican member of Congress was to fight everything Democrats supported. And when voters elected the first African-American president, the very moderate Barack Obama, Republican politicians tried their best to make him fail, despite the harm that did to the country.

Hindus believe in Karma. Christians prefer to say, “you reap what you sow”. The laughable presidency of Donald Trump could well mean the end of the Republican Party, as Americans turn away with disgust from the lies, corruption, and incompetency of this administration. We can only hope that some principled conservatives start a new party or sweep up the shards of the broken GOP. But if we don’t want to go the way of the Roman Empire, we must never forget what happens when the pursuit of power overwhelms patriotism.

Geert Wilders’ “Loss”

Problems in the EU parallel those in the U.S.

Germany, March 23, 2017

After the Brexit vote and Donald Trump’s surprise election, many of us feared that right-wing populism would continue its momentum and win other Europe elections as well. After the Dutch vote, we breathed a sigh of relief. But will populism be stopped in its tracks?

Geert Wilders, head of the populist right-wing PVV, is best known for his opposition to Islam. A member of the anti-EU “Nationalist International”, along with France’s Le Pen, Germany’s AfD, Austria’s FPÖ, Italy’s Lega Nord, Britain’s Ukip, Wilders seems to be the most extreme of the group, at least when it comes to Islam. He has called for banning the Koran and mosques in the Netherlands, where Muslims make up about 6% of the population.

For many months prior to the election, Wilders’s PVV was leading the polls. But when the votes were counted on March 15, his party came in second with 13.1%. The clear leader was the center-right VVD, headed by the current prime minister, Mark Ruute, which won 21.3%. Still, the PVV added 5 seats in parliament to its total from 2012, while the VVD lost 8. The biggest gain was chalked up by the Greens, with 10 seats.

So, is the Dutch election a harbinger of things to come? The Economist argues it will have little impact on the French election, which is the one that counts. If Marine Le Pen wins, she will try to pull France out of the EU, which would probably spell the end of the unification project. Currently, Le Pen is expected to make it to the run-off election on May 7, but ultimately lose to the pro-EU candidate Emmanuel Macron.

For those of us who support the liberal international order, which has dominated the West since World War II, we can breathe a sigh of relief over Wilders’s loss. But we should not be complacent. Nationalism and populism are still powerful forces in Europe as well as the United States. We can’t stop populistm by ignoring it and hoping it’ll go away. We can either fight it, give in to it, or strip its supporters away.

Fighting populism is essential, or it will win. We need to object to extremist statements and resist its agenda. But resistance alone won’t defeat populists, since they draw strength from people’s real problems. Giving in to populism is certainly no solution. The free societies we’ve built in Europe since WWII would be threatened, and we could slip back into an age of competing nationalisms and periodic war.

Stripping populist supporters away is the only way to win. This means taking their fundamental concerns – their interests – seriously and looking for ways to meet them. What are these concerns? Fundamentally, people are afraid of losing what’s important to them: their jobs, their communities, their countries.

Globalization, free trade, and economic change have made many people better off, but have also hurt others. The American “Rust Belt”, which has lost manufacturing jobs that you could support a family with, has been replicated in regions throughout Europe. While this will always happen in a dynamic economy, the people who lose their jobs need help to get back on their feet. Since the “Neoliberal Revolution” of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, little has been done for them.

Many people also see their communities threatened by drugs and crime. While violent crime in the US has fallen over the years, many think it has gotten worse. Crime and drug addiction must be fought, but people also need to hear the truth.

Ultimately, populist voters may be most afraid of losing their countries. At a gut level, they fear being overrun by foreigners, especially Muslims, who make up about 6% of the population in France, the Netherlands, and Germany. Due to migration and birth rates, which are higher among Muslim immigrants than native Europeans, their share is growing. These demographic trends are fundamentally changing European countries, and many people don’t like it.

It’s easy to write this fear off as racism, but that would be naïve. While many Muslims have integrated well into European society, some have not. When Turkish President Erdogan tells Turks in Europe to have more children and calls them the future of Europe, fear of demographic changes is hardly irrational. 

Finally, the European Union has become a favorite whipping boy for populists, who argue it’s undemocratic and a project of the elites. The EU certainly needs to be reformed, but its biggest problem is ineffectiveness, not heavy-handedness. The EU’s inability to help the southern periphery overcome the last recession and its failure to handle the refugee crisis suggest we need a stronger Union, not a weaker one.

These basic problems – jobs and wages, crime and drugs, migration and integration, and the EU’s ineffectiveness – are difficult to solve. But the future of Europe, and of the West, will depend on how well we do it.

Jesus Is Lord – and Trump Isn’t

The gates of Hell will not prevail.

March 15, 2017

For those of us who are politically to the left of the far right, the time since November 8 has been depressing, and the two months since January 20 have been downright shocking. We may have hoped that the reality TV star whom a minority of voters elected president would suddenly act like one, but it’s clear our hopes have been dashed.

Every day, it seems, a new outrage awaits. Trump’s inauguration speech, with its coarse nationalism of “America First”, was quickly followed by “alternative facts” about inauguration attendance. He followed with the speech at CIA headquarters, where he hinted about stealing Iraqi oil. Then came the chaos at the borders, when Trump’s ill-prepared executive order barred entry by anyone with a passport from one of seven Muslim countries, including permanent residents of the United States.

While our attention is now being held by revelations of the Trump campaign’s frighteningly close ties to Vladimir Putin’s hostile government, Republicans in Congress are pushing their extremist agenda, from eliminating the Environmental Protection Agency to repealing the Affordable Care Act.

But far worse than anything Congress is doing is the reign of Trump and his inner circle. Steve Bannon, a white supremacist and godfather of the “alt-right”, is Trump’s most influential advisor. He was quoted after the election saying “Darkness is good: Dick Cheney, Darth Vader, Satan. That’s power.” But this admirer of darkness would have no power if Donald J. Trump were a different sort of man. An extreme narcissist who cares not a bit for truth or reality, he’s addicted to the adulation of his “base”, who apparently are living in an imaginary world of their own making. Fake news, alternative facts, attacks on the press, bans on refugees: Could anything worse happen to our country? 

President Trump reminds me of a narcissistic Roman emperor, like Nero or Caligula, or maybe Commodus. Netflix’s series “Roman Empire: Reign of Blood” tells the story of Commodus, the son of Marcus Aurelius, who becomes emperor when his father dies. The parallel to our times is striking. Marcus Aurelius was a philosopher and a great emperor, somewhat like the constitutional scholar Barack Obama, while Commodus was a narcissist who cared only about his pleasure and the people’s adulation. After a bloody and incompetent reign, Commodus was murdered. And the chaos that followed, in which five emperors succeeded each other in just one year, should be a warning to anyone who thinks assassination is the solution. 

While the Trump presidency will certainly put our country to the test, Christians need not fear. In the Roman Empire, Christians said “Jesus is Lord, and Caesar isn’t.” Christians today can likewise say, “Jesus is Lord, and Trump isn’t.”

That doesn’t mean that President Trump and his modern-day Rasputin Steve Bannon can’t do a lot of harm. We know from history that Christian countries can fall. The Western Roman Empire fell to Aryan Germanic tribes in the 5th century. Invading Muslim Arab armies wrested historic Christian lands – Palestine, Syria, Egypt, North Africa – from the Eastern Roman Empire, and then went on to conquer Spain. In the 13th century, Mongols vanquished the Kievan Rus, today’s Russia and Ukraine, and in the 15th century, the Ottoman Turks occupied Constantinople and reigned over much of the Balkans. In the previous century, Communism took over the Russian Empire and then subjugated Eastern Europe, brutally suppressing Christianity. Jesus promised that the gates of Hell would not prevail against His church, but he didn’t say our kingdoms would stand or we’d be free from persecution.

Still, history shows that God’s people also triumph. A Christian community still exists in Syria, Palestine, and Egypt, though threatened by war and Muslim extremists. Spain was reconquered over 770 years. The Balkans threw off the Ottoman yoke and later Communist rule. Eastern Europe, Ukraine, and Russia today are again Christian, at least nominally. And Christianity in China is experiencing the most rapid growth in the world today.

The United States of America is not the church, and the gates of Hell can certainly prevail against it. The Trump Administration, supported by Republicans in Congress, could usher in the decline and fall of America. But our country has walked through fire before. The Civil War killed hundreds of thousands and threatened to destroy the country, but in the end, the Union prevailed, and the cancer of slavery was excised. America came through the Great Depression, two World Wars, and the Cold War, and it abolished its own form of Apartheid, Jim Crow. We survived the Vietnam War and Watergate. We can now survive Trump.

The crucible of Trump’s reign will test us greatly. We might lose our democracy and turn into an authoritarian state, as happened to Russia under Putin. But if we win, we can usher in a new age, hinted at under President Obama, where we as a country move toward greater freedom, justice and prosperity for all Americans and serve as a force for good in the world. 

I believe this can be our future, because: Jesus is Lord – and Trump isn’t.

“Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go.” Joshua 1:9 (NIV)

Newer posts »